They don't look like idiots to the other know-nothing idiots they're preaching to. I wonder where all their lurkers are? You know the ones:
To the tune of "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean":
The Lurkers support me in e-mail They all think I'm great don't you know. You posters just don't understand me But soon you will reap what you sow.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
The lurkers support me in e-mail "So why don't they post?" you all cry They're scared of your hostile intentions They just can't be as brave as I.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
One day I'll round up all my lurkers We'll have a newsgroup of our own Without all this flak from you morons My lurkers will post round my throne.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
(Author is Jo Walton....)
They seem to be as nebulous and ethereal as ever. I note Mark take great pride in how many views a question got, but doesn't pay much attention to what the most popular answers are. Which tends to confirm he wants more to be seen, and cares much less about how he's seen.
Oh, he does make sure we know when an answer he likes gets the most votes - but readily dismisses the lack of votes or downvoting of an answer that he likes.
Mark used to comment that Kevin wasn't very active at Quora, counting how many questions and answers he had. But if you compare Kevin's to Mark's profiles, you'll notice that Kevin has had almost as many views in the past month as Marxy has in total.
A MAC-10 can be easily concealed on your person and can spray more than a thousand rounds per second, which means you can empty a 70 round drum magazine in four seconds.
Really? Thousand rounds per second and shoots 70 rounds in four seconds? Basic math fail. No such animal as a 70 round drum for a mac-10.
And imagine how embarrassing it would be when all those gun-toting vigilantes starting shooting each other because someone dropped a loaded weapon and it went off.
Ahhh yes, the old 'blood on the streets!' and 'old west gun fights!'. Every time over the last 30 years that a state has passed laws allowing concealed carry the left has screeched this mantra. It hasn't happened. Which means N's 'point' is just a projection of his fantasy, but not based in any way upon reality.
more innocent bystanders would be shot than perpetrators because (unlike the Walking Dead) the vast majority of rounds miss their intended target, even at close range.
Again, projection and based upon insufficient knowledge of the subject.
This one makes me laugh. Both Mark and Nikto bought this story hook, line and sinker.
ReplyDeleteYeah dumbshits, the DISPLAY guns on the convention floor will have the firing pins removed.
The guns that people are carrying will most definitely be functional.
A little more thought and a bit less confirmation bias and you two wouldn't look like such idiots.
They don't look like idiots to the other know-nothing idiots they're preaching to. I wonder where all their lurkers are? You know the ones:
ReplyDeleteTo the tune of "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean":
The Lurkers support me in e-mail
They all think I'm great don't you know.
You posters just don't understand me
But soon you will reap what you sow.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
The lurkers support me in e-mail
"So why don't they post?" you all cry
They're scared of your hostile intentions
They just can't be as brave as I.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
One day I'll round up all my lurkers
We'll have a newsgroup of our own
Without all this flak from you morons
My lurkers will post round my throne.
Lurkers, lurkers, lurkers support me, you'll see, you'll see
Off in e-mail the lurkers support me, you'll see.
(Author is Jo Walton....)
They seem to be as nebulous and ethereal as ever. I note Mark take great pride in how many views a question got, but doesn't pay much attention to what the most popular answers are. Which tends to confirm he wants more to be seen, and cares much less about how he's seen.
Re: Quora, that is.
DeleteOh, he does make sure we know when an answer he likes gets the most votes - but readily dismisses the lack of votes or downvoting of an answer that he likes.
DeleteIt's almost like....confirmation bias.
Just noticed something.
DeleteMark used to comment that Kevin wasn't very active at Quora, counting how many questions and answers he had. But if you compare Kevin's to Mark's profiles, you'll notice that Kevin has had almost as many views in the past month as Marxy has in total.
Quantity over quality must be Marxy's mantra.
Oh! Wow....
ReplyDeleteAlmost speechless after reading Nikto's reply.
The stupid hurts.
A MAC-10 can be easily concealed on your person and can spray more than a thousand rounds per second, which means you can empty a 70 round drum magazine in four seconds.
Really? Thousand rounds per second and shoots 70 rounds in four seconds? Basic math fail. No such animal as a 70 round drum for a mac-10.
And imagine how embarrassing it would be when all those gun-toting vigilantes starting shooting each other because someone dropped a loaded weapon and it went off.
Ahhh yes, the old 'blood on the streets!' and 'old west gun fights!'. Every time over the last 30 years that a state has passed laws allowing concealed carry the left has screeched this mantra. It hasn't happened. Which means N's 'point' is just a projection of his fantasy, but not based in any way upon reality.
more innocent bystanders would be shot than perpetrators because (unlike the Walking Dead) the vast majority of rounds miss their intended target, even at close range.
Again, projection and based upon insufficient knowledge of the subject.